All vaccines and now gene therapy injectables, come with dubious safety and efficacy profiles. Pregnant women are particularly at risk.
The COVID-19 mRNA inoculations have been developed extremely quickly. The trials did not include pregnant women. Where is the evidence of safety?
The safety data will only become available as more and more pregnant women get the jab under ‘Emergency Use Authorisation’ (EUA) or ‘Provisional Approval’.
The Phase 3 Trials are being rolled out as mass vaccination across the world. All who get vaccinated are subjects of experimental vaccines* never trialed on humans before.
* mRNA or adenovirus.
Pregnancy adverse events from the jab are generally not reported in hospital and are attributed to ‘getting COVID’!
Reporting systems such as VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System) and DAEN (Database of Adverse Event Notifications – Australia ) are purely voluntary and represent only 1-10% of actual adverse reactions in pregnant women .
Governments are strongly recommending COVID-19 vaccination of pregnant women and severe restrictions on the unvaccinated. This is in the face of very concerning early data on spontaneous abortions and ectopic pregnancies, as well as adverse events of pregnant women. Some countries such as Norway do not recommend COVID-19 vaccination for pregnant women during the formative first trimester.
Early research has been compromised and flawed due to conflicts of interest. ‘Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons‘ has twenty one authors, all of whom work for the CDC (Centre for Disease Control and Prevention) and/or the FDA (Food and Drug administration). Not one has declared the ‘red flag’ fatally flawed statistical errors hiding the seven-fold increase in spontaneous abortions after the COVID jab.
How did the researchers get away with manipulating the figures? 104 women out of 127 who received a COVID-19 vaccine in the first trimester, had a spontaneous abortion: 82%.
They diluted the figures by claiming that those who had spontaneous abortions were part of the total count of all those who were pregnant (827). However, by definition, spontaneous abortions only occur up to week twenty of pregnancy. Beyond twenty weeks they are classed as stillbirths.
The poor quality of results was compounded by the fact that more than 3000 women were never followed up. Additionally there was no data published on ability to conceive post-injection.
The onus is on pharmaceutical corporations and health departments to prove safety. The only way to achieve this is by voluntary fully informed consent of pregnant women, or women planning pregnancy in these Phase 3 trials. This is not happening.
Absence of proof of safety does not exclude the possibility of harm!
Videos:
Typically the CDC see a 2 fold increase as a danger signal But our studies show a 1500 fold increase in menstrual abnormality A 58 fold in Miscarriages and a 38 fold in Fetal death VAERS reproductive reports: COVID-19 Vaccines: The Impact on Pregnancy Outcomes
and Menstrual Function
James A. Thorp, M.D. et al.
“The CDC separately has told us 65% of women who delivered a baby in the United States took a shot either before the pregnancy or during the pregnancy.”
I interviewed fetal-maternal medicine specialist Dr James Thorp recently; he has been one of the very few medical providers for pregnant women and babies, to have raised the alarm about massive damage to women and babies via the mRNA injection. The interview, in a transcript that I have edited for clarity, is one of the most important exchanges of our time.
Dr McLinden recently spoke at length with Graham Hood on his Club Grubbery on social media. Hood said “dozens of doctors” were now approaching his group. McLinden had sounded warnings to pregnant women about potential miscarriages following mRNA shots. His personal research revealed pregnancy losses in up to 74% of the vaccinated women in his practice – 4.6 to 14.8 times higher than typical normal rates of loss which range from 5 to 16% (58 – 69% above typical losses).
Research/Articles:
A few weeks ago, I wrote an article about how pregnant women are being advised to get the whooping cough vaccination during pregnancy.
I explained that although doctors and health care professionals were portraying the whooping cough vaccination as a single vaccine, in reality there is no such thing as a single vaccine for whooping cough and that instead they are being given ADACEL, a vaccination for Tetanus, Diphtheria and Pertusis (whooping cough).
During my research, I discovered that according to the ADACEL information sheet, Adacel may be causing a higher percentage of miscarriage and babies born with serious birth defects.
The Covid shots are catastrophic to pregnant women and unborn babies. Why are they risking the future of humanity? – Dr. James Thorp
Typically the CDC sees a 2 fold increase as a danger signal
But our studies show a 1500-fold increase in menstrual abnormality 58-fold in Miscarriages and a 38-fold in Fetal death.
Answer: just remove most-likely-to-miscarry vaccinated women from the data!
A newly published study that intended to prove that COVID vaccines are safe for women trying to become pregnant is raising more questions than it answers.
The study appears to intentionally exclude women most likely to experience miscarriage, but only among the vaccinated cohort!
Dr. Kimberly Biss, an OB-GYN who has been involved in 8,000 pregnancies, details how miscarriage rates have doubled year-over-year since the introduction of the COVID-19 injections.
Pfizer had completed their randomized study but instead of enrolling the planned 4,000 moms-to-be, they enrolled 683 and only 161 women received 2 vaccines and 159 got placebo & completed the blinded period.
Why did the trial stop enrolling when it was so tiny?
Could it be they found a concerning signal and did not want to chance letting it become significant?
Could it have been this 👇🏻? That 5.1% of infants of vaccinated moms had adverse events of special interest (AESI) between birth and 6 months while only 1.3% of infants in the control arm had AESIs?
Because they limited the size of the trial, Pfizer can always say they didn’t find a significant signal. But if they don’t look, how can they find it?
Also, why are there only 156 infants in the vaccine arm and 159 in the placebo arm when 161 women received the vaccine and 159 received the placebo (and completed the blinded period)?
Pfizer Post-Marketing Report by Barbara Gehrett, MD; Joseph Gehrett, MD; Chris Flowers, MD; and Loree Britt
-
Twenty-eight deaths of either a fetus or neonate happened to women in the vaccinated group (124 women). So, 23% of the vaccinated mothers had fetuses or newborns who died.
-
These “losses” were described as spontaneous abortion (miscarriage) or various other terms which mean death of the fetus or baby.
“The CDC separately has told us 65% of women who delivered a baby in the United States took a shot either before the pregnancy or during the pregnancy.”
A “terrible report” by the National Center for Health Statistics, published on the CDC website, came out in the spring of this year, reported world-renowned cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough. What that report shows is that maternal death rates are increasing in America — and fast.
1 June, 2023 – Dr. Naomi Wolf Uncovers Pfizer’s Depopulation Agenda, as Evidenced by Its Own Documents
“There’s a section of the Pfizer documents in which Pfizer breaks down the adverse events and concludes that women sustain 72% of them,” she continued. “And of those — and these are Pfizer’s words — 16% are quote-unquote “reproductive disorders” compared to 0.49% for men. So they’re very focused on reproduction, on female reproduction.”
COVID vaccine induced antibodies passively transferred to neonates may subvert, damage natural innate antibobies from being ‘educated’, ‘trained’; neonates may be passively immunized to SARS-CoV-2 infection & the high-affinity vaccinal antibodies can outcompete infant’s innate antibodies for antigen.
Concentration of LNPs in ovaries, a doubled pregnancy early loss rate, and raised foetal abnormality rate across all measured categories indicate that designating a safe-in-pregnancy label (B1 category in Australia) was contrary to the available evidence.
Unprecedented Pregnancy Study Fails on Efficacy, Durability, and Offers No Assurances on Long-Term Safety
Regulatory authorities knew that animal studies showed major red flags regarding both pregnancy loss and fetal abnormalities, consistent with the systemic distribution of the mRNA they had been hiding from the public.
While anybody with any level of capacity for rational thought knows by now that there is (and never was) any need for women to get vaccinated before or during pregnancy, many still assume that the vaccine likely does no harm to them.
The trial began in 2021. But over a year after the last woman was enrolled, the company just admitted it still doesn’t have the data.
Story at-a-glance
-
At Lions Gate Hospital in North Vancouver, British Columbia, 13 babies were allegedly stillborn in a period of 24 hours; all of their mothers had received a COVID-19 injection
-
At a rally outside the hospital, doctors launched an official complaint with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police against executives at the College of Physicians & Surgeons of BC, alleging conflicts of interest influencing their policies, decisions and statements made to the people of British Columbia
-
Scotland has also experienced an unusual rise in infant death rates; during September 2021, at least 21 babies under 4 weeks died — a rate of 4.9 per 1,000 births, up from an average of 2 per 1,000 births
-
As of November 12, 2021, there were 2,620 cases of fetal death or stillbirth among women who received a COVID-19 injection reported to the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)
-
The CDC-sponsored study that was widely used to support the U.S. recommendation for pregnant women to get injected “presents falsely reassuring statistics”
-
When the risk of miscarriage was recalculated to include all women injected prior to 20 weeks’ gestation, the incidence was seven to eight times higher than the original study indicated, with a cumulative incidence of miscarriage ranging from 82% to 91%
“A re-analysis of these figures indicates a cumulative incidence of spontaneous abortion ranging from 82% (104/127) to 91% (104/114), 7–8 times higher than the original authors’ results.” (Source)
“Early data from the v-safe surveillance system, the v-safe pregnancy registry, and the VAERS do not indicate any obvious safety signals with respect to pregnancy or neonatal outcomes associated with Covid-19 vaccination in the third trimester of pregnancy”. The ‘elephant in the room’: COVID-19 vaccine had an 82% incidence of spontaneous abortion in the first trimester!
“In the table footnotes, the following content should have been appended to the double dagger footnote:
“No denominator was available to calculate a risk estimate for spontaneous abortions, because at the time of this report, follow-up through 20 weeks was not yet available for 905 of the 1224 participants vaccinated within 30 days before the first day of the last menstrual period or in the first trimester. Furthermore, any risk estimate would need to account for gestational week–specific risk of spontaneous abortion.”
“The study presents falsely reassuring
statistics related to the risk of spontaneous abortion in early pregnancy, since the majority of women in the calculation were exposed to the mRNA product after the outcome period was defined (20 weeks’gestation).”
Experts Warn of ‘Huge Risk’ as Moderna Launches COVID Vaccine Trials for Pregnant Women
“There have been more fetal deaths in the past 11 months following COVID-19 shots than there have been for the past 30+ years following ALL vaccines” (2,198 – Source.)
“That means that following COVID-19 injections into child-bearing women for the past 11 months has seen a 50 X increase in ectopic* pregnancies compared to child-bearing women receiving vaccines for the past 30+ years.”
Use Google Translate to translate this article into English. Below are relevant translated excerpts:
Byram Bridle is Professor of Virology and Immunology at the University of Guelph, Canada. A few days ago, Bridal spoke to radio presenter Alex Pierson with a serious warning about the genetically engineered Covid vaccines . Together with other colleagues in Japan, Bridle had submitted an inquiry to the local registration authority about the Freedom of Information Act – and received information about the previously inaccessible animal test data on the mRNA vaccine from Pfizer and Biontech.
The data, in particular the pharmacokinetic overview tables, show that the mRNA nanoparticles do not remain locally at the puncture site in the muscle tissue, as assumed and claimed by the manufacturers, but reach the organs in sometimes dramatic concentrations…
Bridle warned, “We made a mistake. The spike protein is itself toxic and dangerous to humans. ”It is even transmitted to breastfed children through breast milk.
The spike protein gets into the blood, circulates in the blood for several days after vaccination. It accumulates as soon as it enters the blood and accumulates in a number of tissues such as the spleen, bone marrow, liver, adrenal glands, and, what is particularly worrying to me, it accumulates in fairly high concentrations the ovaries .
Government Promotion:
COVID-19 vaccinations for women who are pregnant, breastfeeding or planning pregnancy
COVID-19 vaccines are recommended for women who are pregnant, breastfeeding or planning pregnancy. Pregnant women who have already received a primary course should discuss with their doctor or vaccination provider whether a booster dose is required during their pregnancy.
Bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are preferred for the primary course and for booster doses in pregnant women.
There is a large body of evidence supporting the safety and effectiveness of ancestral-based (original) mRNA vaccines in pregnancy.2,3
2. Sadarangani M, Soe P, Shulha HP, et al. Safety of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy: A Canadian National Vaccine Safety (CANVAS) network cohort study. The Lancet Infectious Diseases 2022;22:1553-64.
3. Shimabukuro TT, Kim SY, Myers TR, et al. Preliminary findings of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine safety in pregnant persons. N Engl J Med 2021;384:2273-82.
